This week’s big question is:
What are the other ways of working that show the nature/quality of the generative process? (so that viewers can view the generative process)
In the emoji work, I purposefully moved away from “impressions” of the emojis or normal story plot/sequence(?). I figured the initial goal of the emoji work is to generate new content + explore language + translation/interpretation. So, why not
—> a dictionary (keyword = emojis combos —> drawing —> writing), in which emoji combos are words ; drawings are the definitions.
I made a small low tech prototype, replicating the use of a dictionary on my website. www.lilykong.co.uk/emoji
This week I continued to find ways in identifying things happening in my practice. There are transitions in the form of work recently, in which I write, draw, staged an object in a setting, draw, write and so on.
Linkages in the little fragmented work may not have to be its themes, perhaps the linked content in different generative approaches/methods –> forms.
Now I think there are two main things happening in my project:
- Abuse Instagram (which I post my usual illustration + emoji challenge)
- Get out of Instagram (Thinking about platforms)
Here is a trial from Object –> drawing –> photograph(staged) –>comic
This week I did some overview of my work from 2018 – 2021, so as to identify some of the common themes in them.
- Small crisis in daily lives
- Awkward/depress/a little sad
- Situation that only happen in your head
- Moments of peace and love
- Angry moments
- Climate crisis related
And then I realised the illustrations have some common things: some are responses of the event, some are honest/not-so-honest look of the event, some are conversations about the event.
Now that I made these booklets of themes. I am thinking of picking one or two themes to work on in the next four weeks.
I also made booklets to show/find narratives in emojis, emoji drawings and writings. The booklets are like comics but the process starts from collecting emojis from others, draw from emojis, write from those emojis, then draw and write. Repeat.
Here are some examples.
I started working on new exercises, including:
- 15 mins writing everyday
- Emoji writings everyday
- Drawing with lefthand/different medium everyday
- Emoji challanges occasionally on Instagram
I started learning C4D but I don’t think I will incorporate it at this stage of the project. Needed some advice on articulating + explaining the practice and finding linkages. Maybe I will go to peers for advice. Other than that I am thinking if I will continue exploring the psychological aspect of “drawing fast”. I am definitely working towards the pattern and/or structure at this stage.
Perhaps I will post my progress on my portfolio site instead. I am just writing as I think btw. Thoughts that may or may not matter.
Over the break, I took notes from the symposium feedback and Q&A session. A few main questions came up:
- How do you plan to continue this work forward?
- How might it have a life beyond this presentation?
- How do you explore collection information from others?
And so, I started a few different approaches to collecting information, translating and communicating it with others. I worked on “internet language”/“colloquial language” —> in this case, emoji and text language. In December 2020, I asked people on Instagram stories to send me emojis without textual explanations. I drew them with my interpretation of the message plus imagination.
This approach was unfamiliar. There were lots of mystery between the sender, me and the message, which was super interesting. Most of the times, I guessed who they are, what they are doing. It is almost like a one-sided conversation, or confession. It opens up new things to draw/imagine. I had to think of “story” using these emoji elements and compose a properly-completely-different story in these drawings.
“Send me emoji(s)” seemed very broad. I wanted to know how different it is to work with a more specific question –> “How’s your day?”
This time I felt a slightly different “vibe”. Since the answers were directed to a more specific question, the emoji messages seemed to be more static. They were more predictable, so as the drawings. I wonder what would be happen if I ask people to write me a much longer letter. But would it lose the immediacy of a text?
During the break, I also started drawing with my lefthand. I picked the quotes and poems that I collected over time and made drawings with my unfamiliar hand. It was very slow. I lost much control and preciseness in comparison to using my right hand.
How can I lie to you now thread my voice with lies of lightness force within my mirror eyes the cold disguise of sad and wise decisions - Maya Angelou
This post serves as a summary of my three triangulation projects.
84 pages book, printed in A5 off white paper. It is a collection of drawings from 21 Oct – 11 Nov 2020.
An archive of my poems “You” on my website.
37 Instagram stories (instead of posts) of drawings, questions and responses. Clicking the link will bring you to my profile. Then watch the story highlights named “Lockdown 2.0”.
Last day of lockdown woohoo!
This week, I have been working on the writing. It is going to be called Drawing Fast, Writing Loose, in which explores working fast in drawing and writing in the age of internet/social media.
Here are some notes from the book Thinking fast and slow, which has some very interesting points about the way we think.
27 Nov notes
Thinking fast and slow
Podcast – What you will Learn
Fast thinking (system 1) – the gut, the intuition, operates quickly and automatically thinking with zero or very little control, snaps it to actions and make assumptions.
A lot of these emotional and feelings based things happen as snap judgements
Also after you become more competent or after you practice something a lot, something may started to shift to system 1 cause you are more familiar with it and you don’t have to think much about it.
Associative thinking becomes effortless.
Slow thinking (system 2) – demands cognitive effort. Invest or expel energy.
Switching your brain on a different mode, blocking everything else and just focus on one thing deeply
System 2 is pretty lazy —> lots of efforts to invest into
Switching task is effortful – takes time and energy in terms of cognitive capacity to realign to the problem you are focusing
Becos you are investing/spending more cognitive resources on thinking bout things deeply in system 2, you are more likely to give into temptations like deviating from your diet, overspending on purchases, reacting aggressively to request or propagations.
Normally, if you weren’t spending much energy towards system 2, you will be more able to control your impulses.
System 1 uses association and metaphor to produce a quick and dirty draft of reality, which System 2 (slow deliberate thinking) draws on to arrive at explicit beliefs and reasoned choices.
System 1 proposes, System 2 disposes.
System 2, in addition to being more deliberate and rational, is also lazy. And it tires easily. (The vogue term for this is “ego depletion.”) Too often, instead of slowing things down and analyzing them, System 2 is content to accept the easy but unreliable story about the world that System 1 feeds to it.
Podcast- part 1
S1 likes to jump to conclusion and look at the things around it. Keep you/maintained updated and think if this is normal. detects things straight from the norm – constantly assessing things around you.
Associating things with others.
Like “Noah’s Ark” vs “Mose’s Ark” – they both have a biblical context – associating
Jump to conclusions than doing the work itself
If the cost of making a mistake is accessible, or if it takes a lot of effort, then ok S1
Like Interviews – judging on how people interview, dress and speak, instead of how they work in real life
“You are skipping all the information that you don’t see. —> what you see is all there is.”
The central image/ simplified message /no background props/ minimum choice of colours —> ease readers to jump to a conclusion —> less cognitive thinking—> less effort —> people are lazy —> easier to attract attention —> easier to keep you in the loop becos it can be understood effortless
Triangulation 2 is a website. It is meant to be an archive of drawings and little writings. I wrote while thinking about the linkages between swear words. One of the most obvious example is “YOU”. A lot of emotions and violent thoughts can be concluded in such simple words. I expanded the “YOU” word into different one liner poems.
I would also like to present the linkages between writing/language and drawings. I used drawings with the theme “Life”. (“Life is shit” and “I love my shitty life.” to be precise) The original idea is that – the page filled with the word “Life”. And when you move your mouse to each of them, a drawing about “Life” will pop out. I haven’t gotten there yet because I didn’t know how to.
Drawings wise. I decided to take it slow. There was a lot of stress trying to rush to making anything meaningful and related to what I have previously done. So I am drawing things that come to my mind. They might not make any sense just yet.
25 Nov 2020
I started posting a drawing everyday since the start of Lockdown 2.0 on instagram. I had been doing it all by myself but today I wanted to introduce others’ effort aka I needed help. So this morning, I asked others to give the birdie drawing a caption. Here are the results.
This week I worked on my research. A pdf of writing in progress is sent via email.
Supplementary references for the writing:
“The Shallows” This is Your Brain Online by Nicholas Carr https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127370598&t=1605623688428
How to Swear by Stephen Wildish
Amusing Ourselves to Death – Public Discourse in the age of show business by Neil Postman